Mepolizumab: What the Science Says (and Why Your Eosinophils Care)

Dr. Beltrán J.F. 5 min read 23 views

If you’ve ever wished your airway flare-ups came with an “off” switch, mepolizumab tries to get close. It’s a monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin-5 (IL-5)—a key growth and survival factor for eosinophils, the white cells that love to stir up Type-2 inflammation in lungs and sinuses. When IL-5 is blocked, eosinophils drop, and so (ideally) do exacerbations, steroid dependence, and “why is this happening again?” moments. Big trials back this up—let’s tour the highlights without the jargon.

1 Who actually benefits?

Alt text: Minimalist infographic showing approved uses of mepolizumab: severe eosinophilic asthma, EGPA, hypereosinophilic syndrome, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Severe eosinophilic asthma (adults and adolescents)

Three cornerstone trials anchor the story:

  • DREAM (Lancet, 2012): First large study showing fewer asthma exacerbations with mepolizumab in patients with eosinophilic inflammation.
  • MENSA (NEJM, 2014): Demonstrated meaningful exacerbation reduction with subcutaneous dosing.
  • SIRIUS (NEJM, 2014): Proved an oral steroid–sparing effect in patients stuck on maintenance prednisone.

How much better? In pooled analyses and trials, mepolizumab often cuts annualized exacerbation rates roughly in half for the right patients, with added wins in lung function and quality of life.

Quality of life got a dedicated spotlight in MUSCA (2017), where patients reported clinically important improvements on the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (that’s “daily-life better,” not just “numbers better”).

The eosinophil clue: A key secondary analysis found a clean, dose-response-style relationship—the higher the baseline blood eosinophils (≥150, ≥300, ≥500 cells/µL), the bigger the benefit. Translation: this is precision medicine, not one-size-fits-all.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP)

In SYNAPSE (Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2021), mepolizumab reduced polyp size and improved nasal obstruction in adults who’d already tried standard therapies. Ear, nose, and throat folks cheered; fewer surgeries and less congestion are a big deal for quality of life.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA)

The MIRRA trial (NEJM, 2017) showed mepolizumab increased remission and reduced relapses in EGPA—a rare, vasculitic cousin in the eosinophil family tree.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES)

Two anchors here: an early NEJM 2008 study showing steroid-sparing benefit, and a modern Phase III JACI 2020 trial demonstrating ~50% fewer flares vs placebo over 32 weeks—with no new safety red flags.

COPD with an eosinophilic phenotype

The COPD story matured in two phases. NEJM 2017 reported fewer exacerbations in COPD patients with eosinophilia. A newer Phase III trial (MATINEE, NEJM 2025) confirmed reductions in moderate/severe exacerbations—especially relevant for the subgroup with elevated blood eosinophils. (As always, COPD care remains multi-modal, but this is a clear advance for an identifiable phenotype.)

2 Safety: what long-term data say

Mepolizumab’s safety profile in trials and extensions is… pleasantly boring (and in medicine, boring is beautiful). Across open-label extensions and pooled analyses—COLUMBA, COSMOS, COSMEX—safety was consistent over years with no new signals. The most common annoyances were headaches and injection-site reactions.

There’s also supportive pediatric data (ages 6–11) showing acceptable long-term safety and similar pharmacodynamic eosinophil reductions.

3 How clinicians decide: simple rules of thumb (rooted in evidence)

  • Check blood eosinophils. If you’re ≥150 cells/µL (or historically ≥300 cells/µL), odds of benefit rise.
  • Look at exacerbation history. More recent steroid-treated flare-ups predict more to gain. DREAM/MENSA enrolled frequent exacerbators and saw the biggest wins here.
  • Steroid burden matters. If you’re chained to daily prednisone, the SIRIUS data are especially compelling for tapering.
  • Quality-of-life counts. MUSCA documented real-world-feeling improvements that patients actually notice.

4 Real-world effectiveness (beyond the ivory tower)

The REALITI-A prospective cohort followed patients after prescription in routine clinics. Compared to the year before starting mepolizumab, patients had fewer clinically significant exacerbations and lower maintenance steroid needs—mirroring trial results in real life.

What about side effects?

Across trials, injection-site reactions and headache top the list; serious adverse events are uncommon and comparable to placebo. Long-term extensions didn’t uncover new, late-breaking concerns. As with any biologic, hypersensitivity is possible (your team watches for this).

Quick comparisons people ask about

No two anti-Type-2 biologics are identical, and head-to-head data are sparse. The strongest predictor isn’t your neighbor’s experience—it’s your biology (eosinophils, comorbid nasal polyps/EGPA/HES, steroid dependence, and exacerbation pattern). Discussing these treatable traits with your clinician is the shortcut to the right match.


5 FAQs (evidence-based and concise)

Does mepolizumab work if my eosinophils are “only” 150–300?


Yes—benefit rises with eosinophils, but reductions in exacerbations were seen starting at ≥150 cells/µL in pooled analyses. Higher counts usually predict bigger gains.

Can it help me get off daily prednisone?


For steroid-dependent severe asthma, mepolizumab showed a clear oral-steroid-sparing effect in a randomized trial.

Will I feel better day-to-day, not just have fewer flare-ups?


Patients reported clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life (MUSCA).

Is it safe long-term?


Extension studies up to several years reported stable safety with no new signals. Common side effects were typically mild.

Is there evidence outside trials?


Yes. The REALITI-A real-world study documented fewer exacerbations and less steroid use after starting therapy.


6 Practical takeaways (the TL;DR you can actually use)

  • Right patient, right biology: Elevated eosinophils + frequent flare-ups = higher odds of benefit.
  • Beyond asthma: There’s strong evidence for EGPA and HES, and positive data in CRSwNP.
  • Safety is reassuring: Decent long-term track record with predictable, usually mild side effects.
  • Real world agrees with trials: Fewer flare-ups and less steroid use are not just lab-story wins.

Conclusion

If eosinophils keep writing the script for your asthma—or your EGPA/HES/CRSwNP—mepolizumab puts a new author in the room. The evidence says it can cut flare-ups, trim steroids, and improve daily life for the right people. Bring your numbers (especially blood eosinophils) and your story (exacerbations, steroids, symptoms) to your clinician; together you can decide if this targeted, IL-5-blocking approach fits your biology and your goals.

  1. Pavord ID, et al. Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM). Lancet. 2012;380:651–659. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60988-X.
  2. Ortega HG, et al. Mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma (MENSA). N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1198–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403290.
  3. Bel EH, et al. Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect (SIRIUS). N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1189–1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403291.
  4. Chupp GL, et al. Quality of life improvements (MUSCA). Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:390–400. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30125-X.
  5. Ortega HG, et al. Benefit by eosinophil threshold (DREAM & MENSA post-hoc). Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:549–556. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30031-5.
  6. Han JK, et al. CRSwNP (SYNAPSE). Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9:1141–1153. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00097-7.
  7. Wechsler ME, et al. EGPA (MIRRA). N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1921–1932. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702079.
  8. Roufosse F, et al. HES Phase III. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146:1397–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.037.
  9. Rothenberg ME, et al. HES steroid-sparing (early trial). N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1215–1228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070812.
  10. Khatri S, et al. Long-term safety & durability (COLUMBA). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143:1742–1751.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.09.033.
  11. Lugogo N, et al. Open-label extension (COSMOS). Clin Ther. 2016;38:2058–2070.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.010.
  12. Khurana S, et al. Most severe asthma (COSMEX). Clin Ther. 2019;41:2041–2056.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.07.007.
  13. Harrison T, et al. REALITI-A initial analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:2000151. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00151-2020.
  14. Pavord ID, et al. COPD with eosinophilic phenotype (METREX/METREO). N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1613–1629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708208.
  15. Sciurba FC, et al. COPD exacerbation prevention (MATINEE). N Engl J Med. 2025;392:1710–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2413181.
  16. Gupta A, et al. Children 6–11 years: long-term safety/PD. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144:1336–1342.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.005.

Share this Article

Related Articles